![]() I'd like to look at this issue from another angle, though. I agree being simple and 'just like Microsoft PowerPoint' is a flimsy argument. I am using Captivate 9 as a subscription, and seem to be using it much more than Storyline, although the more Advanced use of custom actions can be somewhat daunting at first. ![]() PDF is a native file format in the Windows 10 browser and I would anticipate other browsers will also make this a native file format, doing away with the Acrobat reader entirely, just as the Flash Player will no longer be supported - ActiveX and plugins are just too much of a security risk, and the sooner we make the jump to xAPI and let go of SCORM the better, but Captivate's SCORM support is equal to Storyline for I believe they both use the Rustici SCORM Engine. Yes, the learning curve for Captivate is longer, and there are some features within Storyline 2 that I really like, people fail to see the advantages of interactive PDF, particularly in its ability to use 3D objects in authoring tools such as Sim Labs Composer and output to PDF. Adobe has seen the proverbial "writing on the wall" in terms of HTML5 and the eventual demise of Flash, this is why Adobe has created so many complimentary HTML5-based products while still maintaining Air and Flash CC Pro. While I have both, I have to agree with Mark on all counts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |